Chatwoot vs Hiver
Chatwoot is open-source customer engagement platform. Best suited for technical teams wanting open-source flexibility. Known for its open-source with self-hosting option.
Hiver is gmail-based customer service platform. Best suited for organizations heavily invested in Gmail who primarily handle email support. Known for its native Gmail integration and shared mailbox management.
Chatwoot HiverChatwoot is free to self-host with multi-channel messaging across 7+ platforms, while Hiver Pro costs $55/user/month for Gmail-native support — Chatwoot provides open-source infrastructure with broad channel coverage, Hiver provides zero-friction Gmail enhancement. Chatwoot (G2: 4.4/5, MIT license) handles live chat, WhatsApp, Telegram, Messenger, Instagram, Twitter/X, and email with self-hosted or cloud deployment. Hiver (G2: 4.6/5) adds shared labels, collision detection, SLA tracking, and AI directly inside Gmail.
The architectural divide: Chatwoot is a standalone open-source platform that requires separate deployment. Hiver is a Gmail add-on that requires Google Workspace. Chatwoot offers more channels at lower cost. Hiver offers zero adoption friction for Gmail teams. The choice depends on technical capability and email provider.
What features does Chatwoot offer?
Chatwoot's feature set is built around its target customer base, a key differentiator against Hiver. It uses a per seat pricing model starting at From $19/seat/mo, a different approach from Hiver's per seat structure. The features split across channel coverage, automation depth, AI tooling, and team management. Converge ($49/month flat for up to 15 agents) covers all of these in its base subscription.
What features does Hiver offer?
Hiver's feature set is built around its target customer base, a key differentiator against Chatwoot. It uses a per seat pricing model starting at From $25/seat/mo, a different approach from Chatwoot's per seat structure. The features split across channel coverage, automation depth, AI tooling, and team management. Converge ($49/month flat for up to 15 agents) covers all of these in its base subscription.
How do Chatwoot and Hiver compare on features?
Chatwoot and Hiver compete in the same category but tune their feature sets for different team profiles. The material differences cluster around channel coverage, automation depth, reporting, and team management. The side-by-side below draws on aggregated G2 and Capterra reviews. A flat-rate alternative like Converge ($49/month for up to 15 agents) may sidestep the trade-off entirely.
Chatwoot provides open-source multi-channel messaging independent of email provider; Hiver provides Gmail-native collaboration with recent channel additions — different architectures for different teams. Chatwoot self-hosted handles live chat, email, WhatsApp, Telegram, Messenger, Instagram, and Twitter/X. Captain AI provides basic assistance. Automation rules route conversations. The API and MIT license enable unlimited customization.
Hiver works entirely inside Gmail: shared labels, round-robin assignment, collision detection, @mentions, email notes, and automation rules. AI Compose drafts replies. Pro adds WhatsApp, voice, SLAs, and CSAT — extending beyond email-only.
Channel comparison: Chatwoot supports Telegram, Twitter/X, and Instagram natively. Hiver supports email, live chat, WhatsApp (Pro), and voice (Pro). Chatwoot has far broader channel coverage. Hiver's strength is the Gmail-native experience. Neither supports Discord or Zalo.
How much do Chatwoot and Hiver cost?
Chatwoot starts at From $19/seat/mo (per seat); Hiver starts at From $25/seat/mo (per seat). Converge is $49/month flat for up to 15 agents with all channels and AI included.
A 10-agent team on Chatwoot self-hosted costs ~$30/month versus Hiver Pro at $550/month — Chatwoot is 18x cheaper with broader channel coverage, but requires DevOps to maintain. Chatwoot cloud Startups ($19/agent, 10 agents) = $190/month — still 65% cheaper than Hiver Pro. Both include AI: Chatwoot's Captain AI uses credits; Hiver Pro bundles AI Agents and Copilot.
For zero-cost entry: Chatwoot Hacker (free cloud, 2 agents, 500 conversations) versus Hiver free (shared inboxes, email + live chat, no time limit). Hiver's free tier is more useful for ongoing email collaboration. Chatwoot self-hosted provides unlimited free usage with more channels.
Hiver has no equivalent to Chatwoot's self-hosting option. For teams that can manage infrastructure, Chatwoot eliminates ongoing SaaS cost entirely. For teams that cannot, Hiver's managed Gmail experience is worth the per-user premium.
Chatwoot Pricing
Hiver Pricing
What are Chatwoot's strengths and limitations?
Chatwoot's biggest strengths cluster around what reviewers consistently single out as its standout capability, which is what makes it a strong fit for technical teams wanting open-source flexibility. Its limitations cluster around pricing-model fit at smaller team sizes and around channel coverage gaps relative to a messaging-first inbox. The detailed lists below come from aggregated G2 and Capterra reviews plus our own internal customer-pipeline reports — teams that are using Chatwoot today as their primary inbox, plus teams that evaluated and ultimately rejected it during their selection process. Read them carefully side-by-side with Hiver's breakdown lower on this page to decide which of the two platforms fits where your team is heading next quarter — or whether a flat-rate alternative like Converge ($49/month, up to 15 agents, all channels and AI included) is a better path entirely, sidestepping both vendors.
Strengths
- Open-source option available
- Good channel coverage
- Active development community
- Self-hosting possible
Limitations
- Per-agent pricing model
- Self-hosting requires technical expertise
- Limited advanced features in lower tiers
- No Discord or Zalo support
What are Hiver's strengths and limitations?
Hiver's biggest strengths cluster around what reviewers consistently single out as its standout capability, which is what makes it a strong fit for organizations heavily invested in gmail who primarily handle email support. Its limitations cluster around pricing-model fit at smaller team sizes and around channel coverage gaps relative to a messaging-first inbox. The detailed lists below come from aggregated G2 and Capterra reviews plus our own internal customer-pipeline reports — teams that are using Hiver today as their primary inbox, plus teams that evaluated and ultimately rejected it during their selection process. Read them carefully alongside Chatwoot's breakdown earlier on this page to decide which of the two platforms fits where your team is heading next quarter — or whether a flat-rate alternative like Converge ($49/month, up to 15 agents, all channels and AI included) is a better path entirely, sidestepping both vendors.
Strengths
- Seamless Gmail integration
- Easy setup for Gmail users
- Good email management features
- Familiar interface
Limitations
- Limited to Gmail ecosystem
- No modern messaging channels
- Expensive per-user pricing
- Lacks WhatsApp and social messaging
Chatwoot or Hiver: which should you pick?
Pick Chatwoot if your primary need maps to its standout capability and its pricing model works at your team size. Pick Hiver if your team profile maps to its strengths instead. If neither fits — for example, a 3-15 agent team handling messaging channels (WhatsApp, Telegram, Messenger, Instagram, Discord, Zalo) wanting flat-rate pricing — Converge is $49/month flat for up to 15 agents, with all channels and AI tooling included.
Choose Chatwoot if you have developers and need messaging channels (WhatsApp, Telegram, Messenger, Instagram) at minimal cost. Self-hosted is free with no agent limits. The MIT license allows unlimited customization. Cloud plans ($19–$99/agent) eliminate DevOps. Chatwoot works with any email provider — no Gmail dependency.
Choose Hiver if your team uses Google Workspace and handles support primarily through email. Zero training — agents work in Gmail. Pro at $55/user adds WhatsApp, voice, AI Agents, Copilot, SLA management, and CSAT. The free tier covers basic shared inboxes. Hiver requires Google Workspace — it does not work with Outlook or other providers.
When should you choose Chatwoot or Hiver?
Chatwoot is the right tool for technical teams that want broad multi-channel messaging at minimal cost with full platform control. Hiver is the right tool for Gmail-native teams that want zero adoption friction and can accept higher per-user cost and fewer channels in exchange for the familiar Gmail interface.
For teams that want managed multi-channel support without self-hosting or Gmail dependency, Converge offers all channels at $49/month flat for up to 15 agents.
Looking for more options? Browse all platform comparisons, or see all Chatwoot comparisons and all Hiver comparisons.
Frequently Asked Questions
Chatwoot is best for Technical teams wanting open-source flexibility. Hiver is best for Organizations heavily invested in Gmail who primarily handle email support. Chatwoot's standout feature is Open-source with self-hosting option, while Hiver offers Native Gmail integration and shared mailbox management.
Chatwoot starts at From $19/seat/mo. Hiver starts at From $25/seat/mo. Chatwoot offers a free plan. Hiver offers a free plan. For flat-rate pricing, consider Converge at $49/month for up to 15 agents.
Chatwoot offers a free plan. Hiver offers a free plan. Both are established platforms in the customer support space.
Chatwoot pros: Open-source option available; Good channel coverage. Hiver pros: Seamless Gmail integration; Easy setup for Gmail users. Each platform has distinct strengths depending on your use case.
Choose Chatwoot for Technical teams wanting open-source flexibility. Choose Hiver for Organizations heavily invested in Gmail who primarily handle email support. If you need messaging-first support with flat pricing, consider Converge as an alternative at $49/month for up to 15 agents.
Ready to try Converge?
$49/month flat. Up to 15 agents. 7-day free trial, no credit card required.
Start Free Trial