- Compare
- Chatwoot vs Front
Chatwoot vs Front
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | Chatwoot | Front |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $19/seat/mo | From $79/seat/mo |
| Best For | Technical teams wanting open-source flexibility | Medium to large technology companies ($10M+ revenue) with complex customer service operations requiring advanced collaboration and automation |
| Standout Feature | Open-source with self-hosting option | AI-powered collaboration platform that transforms shared inboxes into intelligent team workspaces with real-time suggested responses and automated workflows |
| Free Plan | ✓ | ✗ |
| G2 Rating | 4.4 | 4.7/5 |
Chatwoot and Front represent different philosophies in customer support software. Chatwoot offers an open-source, developer-friendly platform with flexible deployment options, while Front provides a polished, enterprise-ready collaborative inbox solution with advanced automation capabilities.
The decision typically hinges on whether you value Chatwoot's open-source flexibility and lower costs or Front's sophisticated features and enterprise-grade support.
Feature Comparison
Chatwoot provides a solid foundation with multi-channel support (email, chat, social media), basic automation, and the significant advantage of being open-source. Teams can self-host, customize the codebase, and integrate deeply with existing systems. It offers essential features like canned responses, team collaboration, and basic reporting.
Front delivers enterprise-level sophistication with advanced workflow automation, detailed analytics dashboards, sophisticated conversation routing, and extensive third-party integrations. Its collaborative features include internal comments, @mentions, advanced assignment rules, and comprehensive SLA management that Chatwoot lacks.
Chatwoot appeals to technical teams wanting customization control, while Front serves organizations needing ready-to-use advanced features without development overhead.
Pricing Comparison
Chatwoot starts at $20 per agent monthly with custom pricing for enterprise needs, making it more affordable than Front's $25-$105 per seat pricing. For a 10-person team, Chatwoot costs around $200 monthly compared to Front's $250-$1,050.
However, Chatwoot's lower cost may require additional development resources for customization and advanced features. Front's higher pricing includes sophisticated out-of-the-box functionality that would require significant development effort to replicate in Chatwoot.
Chatwoot
Pros
- ✓ Open-source option available
- ✓ Good channel coverage
- ✓ Active development community
Cons
- ✗ Per-agent pricing model
- ✗ Self-hosting requires technical expertise
- ✗ Limited advanced features in lower tiers
Front
Pros
- ✓ Excellent team collaboration features with @mentions and internal comments
- ✓ Modern, intuitive interface familiar to email users
- ✓ Strong AI capabilities including real-time response suggestions
Cons
- ✗ Premium pricing that can be expensive for smaller teams
- ✗ Essential features locked behind higher-tier plans
- ✗ Single channel limitation on Starter plan
Verdict
Choose Chatwoot if you want open-source flexibility, developer customization options, and pricing starting at $20/agent/month. Choose Front if you need enterprise-grade features, advanced automation, and can invest $25-$105/seat/month for comprehensive support tools.
Choose Chatwoot if: You have technical resources, want open-source flexibility, need custom integrations, and prefer lower base costs with the option to self-host and customize extensively.
Choose Front if: You need enterprise-ready features immediately, want advanced automation and analytics without development work, and can justify the premium pricing for comprehensive functionality.
Alternative consideration: Converge's $49/month flat pricing could bridge the gap, offering more advanced features than Chatwoot's base plan while remaining more affordable than Front's higher tiers.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all Chatwoot comparisons and all Front comparisons.