- Compare
- Front vs LiveAgent
Front vs LiveAgent
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | Front | LiveAgent |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $79/seat/mo | From $49/seat/mo |
| Best For | Medium to large technology companies ($10M+ revenue) with complex customer service operations requiring advanced collaboration and automation | Traditional customer service teams needing comprehensive help desk functionality with phone support |
| Standout Feature | AI-powered collaboration platform that transforms shared inboxes into intelligent team workspaces with real-time suggested responses and automated workflows | Comprehensive all-in-one platform combining help desk, live chat, and call center in a single solution |
| Free Plan | ✗ | ✓ |
| G2 Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.5/5 |
Front and LiveAgent represent two different philosophies in customer support software. Front positions itself as a collaborative inbox for teams, while LiveAgent focuses on comprehensive multichannel support with built-in live chat capabilities.
With Front's G2 rating of 4.7/5 compared to LiveAgent's 4.5/5, both platforms have strong user satisfaction, but their approaches to customer service management differ significantly.
Feature Comparison
Front excels in team collaboration with shared inboxes, internal comments, and workflow automation. Its strength lies in turning customer conversations into collaborative team efforts, with features like message assignments and team analytics.
LiveAgent takes a more traditional help desk approach, offering robust ticketing, live chat, call center functionality, and social media integration. It includes a built-in knowledge base and customer portal, making it a more complete support ecosystem out of the box.
Front integrates deeply with productivity tools like Slack and Asana, while LiveAgent provides native call center features and more extensive reporting capabilities.
Pricing Comparison
Front's pricing ranges from $25 to $105 per seat monthly, making it expensive for larger teams. The cost can quickly escalate as you add more agents and advanced features.
LiveAgent offers more budget-friendly options, starting free and scaling to $69 per agent monthly. This makes LiveAgent significantly more cost-effective for teams with 10+ agents, where Front's per-seat pricing becomes prohibitive.
For a 20-agent team, Front could cost $500-$2,100 monthly, while LiveAgent would range from free to $1,380 monthly at maximum tier.
Front
Pros
- ✓ Excellent team collaboration features with @mentions and internal comments
- ✓ Modern, intuitive interface familiar to email users
- ✓ Strong AI capabilities including real-time response suggestions
Cons
- ✗ Premium pricing that can be expensive for smaller teams
- ✗ Essential features locked behind higher-tier plans
- ✗ Single channel limitation on Starter plan
LiveAgent
Pros
- ✓ Extensive feature set with 188+ capabilities
- ✓ Strong call center functionality with unlimited recordings
- ✓ Mature platform with robust reporting and analytics
Cons
- ✗ Per-agent pricing can become expensive for larger teams
- ✗ Complex interface may overwhelm users focused on messaging
- ✗ Social media integrations require additional fees on lower tiers
Verdict
Choose Front if you need advanced team collaboration features and can justify the higher per-seat cost. Choose LiveAgent if you want comprehensive multichannel support with more affordable pricing, especially for larger teams.
Choose Front if: You prioritize team collaboration over individual agent productivity and have budget flexibility for premium per-seat pricing.
Choose LiveAgent if: You need comprehensive multichannel support with call center features at a more predictable cost structure.
Consider Converge as an alternative at $49/month flat rate - offering team collaboration without per-agent pricing that scales with your growth.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all Front comparisons and all LiveAgent comparisons.