Sendbird vs Userlike
Converge Team
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | Sendbird | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $399/mo | From $90/mo |
| Best For | Developers building custom in-app messaging experiences | European companies requiring GDPR compliance |
| Standout Feature | Comprehensive SDK with voice, video, and messaging | Built-in video calling functionality |
| Free Plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| G2 Rating | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Sendbird and Userlike represent two distinct approaches to customer communication. Sendbird excels as a developer-focused chat API platform with robust messaging infrastructure, while Userlike specializes in live chat widgets and customer service automation.
This comparison examines their core capabilities, pricing structures, and ideal use cases to help you determine which platform aligns with your business needs.
Feature Comparison
Sendbird provides comprehensive messaging APIs with real-time chat, voice, and video capabilities. Its strength lies in scalable infrastructure supporting millions of concurrent users and extensive SDK support across platforms.
Userlike focuses on website live chat with intelligent routing, chatbots, and seamless handoffs between automated and human agents. It offers superior visitor tracking and proactive chat triggers.
Sendbird wins for custom applications requiring deep messaging integration, while Userlike excels for traditional customer support scenarios.
Pricing Comparison
Sendbird uses usage-based pricing starting at $399/month for 1,000 monthly active users, with costs scaling based on user volume and feature requirements.
Userlike offers per-agent pricing from €90/month per agent, making it more predictable for small to medium teams but potentially expensive for larger organizations.
Consider your user base size and growth projections when evaluating total cost of ownership.
Sendbird
Pros
- ✓ Comprehensive SDK suite
- ✓ Excellent developer documentation
- ✓ Scalable infrastructure
Cons
- ✗ Expensive for small businesses
- ✗ Complex pricing structure
- ✗ Limited social media integrations
Userlike
Pros
- ✓ Strong European presence
- ✓ GDPR compliant
- ✓ Good WhatsApp integration
Cons
- ✗ Expensive operator-based pricing
- ✗ Limited customization
- ✗ Fewer integrations than competitors
Verdict
Choose Sendbird if you need a powerful API-first messaging platform with extensive customization options and developer tools. Choose Userlike if you want a user-friendly live chat solution with strong automation features and quick setup.
Choose Sendbird if: You're building custom applications requiring robust messaging APIs, need to support high user volumes, or require extensive developer customization options.
Choose Userlike if: You want quick-to-deploy live chat for your website, need strong automation features, or prefer straightforward per-agent pricing.
For teams seeking a cost-effective alternative, consider Converge at $49/month flat rate, offering comprehensive customer communication features without per-agent fees.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all Sendbird comparisons and all Userlike comparisons.