LiveChat vs Userlike
Converge Team
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | LiveChat | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $49/seat/mo | From $90/mo |
| Best For | E-commerce teams needing visitor tracking with WhatsApp support | European companies requiring GDPR compliance |
| Standout Feature | Detailed visitor tracking with real-time website analytics | Built-in video calling functionality |
| Free Plan | ✗ | ✓ |
| G2 Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.3 |
LiveChat and Userlike both target businesses seeking professional live chat solutions, but they serve different market segments. LiveChat offers a feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, while Userlike focuses on European businesses with GDPR compliance and multilingual support as core strengths.
The choice often comes down to geographic focus, compliance requirements, and whether you prefer depth of features versus specialized regional expertise.
Feature Comparison
LiveChat provides comprehensive features including advanced chat routing, detailed visitor tracking, and over 200 integrations. Its strength lies in customization options, from widget appearance to complex automation rules, plus robust mobile apps for agents.
Userlike excels in areas that matter to European businesses: built-in GDPR compliance, data hosting in Germany, and native support for multiple European languages. It offers clean, intuitive interfaces and focuses on essential chat features without overwhelming complexity.
LiveChat wins on feature breadth and integrations, while Userlike wins on compliance, data privacy, and regional specialization.
Pricing Comparison
LiveChat's pricing ranges from $20 to $149 per agent monthly, with most businesses needing the $41 Team plan for core features. The per-agent model can become expensive for larger teams but offers predictable scaling.
Userlike uses a different approach with plans from €90 to €360 monthly for the entire team (up to certain agent limits). This flat-rate pricing can be more economical for larger teams but may seem expensive for solo operators.
For teams of 1-3 agents, LiveChat is typically more affordable. For teams of 4+ agents, Userlike's flat pricing often provides better value.
LiveChat
Pros
- ✓ Excellent visitor tracking and analytics
- ✓ Strong integration ecosystem (200+ apps)
- ✓ Reliable WhatsApp Business API support
Cons
- ✗ Per-agent pricing model
- ✗ ChatBot automation is separate product
- ✗ No native Telegram or Zalo support
Userlike
Pros
- ✓ Strong European presence
- ✓ GDPR compliant
- ✓ Good WhatsApp integration
Cons
- ✗ Expensive operator-based pricing
- ✗ Limited customization
- ✗ Fewer integrations than competitors
Verdict
Choose LiveChat if you need extensive third-party integrations and advanced customization options. Choose Userlike if GDPR compliance, European data hosting, and multilingual support are priorities.
Choose LiveChat if: You need extensive integrations, advanced customization, or operate primarily outside Europe where GDPR compliance isn't critical.
Choose Userlike if: You're a European business prioritizing data privacy, need multilingual support, or have a larger team that benefits from flat-rate pricing.
Consider Converge at $49/month flat rate if you want the simplicity of flat pricing without geographic restrictions, offering predictable costs as your team grows.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all LiveChat comparisons and all Userlike comparisons.