Hiver vs MessageBird (Bird)
Converge Team
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | Hiver | MessageBird (Bird) |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $35/seat/mo | From $30/seat/mo |
| Best For | Organizations heavily invested in Gmail who primarily handle email support | Large enterprises with complex communication needs |
| Standout Feature | Native Gmail integration and shared mailbox management | Global SMS delivery network |
| Free Plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| G2 Rating | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Hiver and MessageBird serve vastly different segments of business communication. Hiver transforms Gmail into a collaborative helpdesk for email-based customer support teams, while MessageBird provides enterprise-grade communication APIs and omnichannel messaging infrastructure for developers and large organizations.
The comparison highlights a choice between ready-to-use email collaboration tools versus programmable communication infrastructure that requires technical implementation.
Feature Comparison
Hiver provides plug-and-play email collaboration with collision detection, shared inboxes, email assignments, and SLA tracking—all within the familiar Gmail interface. It requires no technical setup and works immediately for teams already using Google Workspace.
MessageBird offers comprehensive communication APIs including SMS, voice, WhatsApp Business, email, and chat channels. It provides conversation management, contact center solutions, and programmable communication flows designed for developers building custom customer engagement platforms.
The fundamental difference is implementation approach: Hiver offers immediate functionality for email teams, while MessageBird provides building blocks for custom communication solutions.
Pricing Comparison
Hiver uses transparent per-user pricing at $15/user/month with all email collaboration features included. Pricing is predictable and scales linearly with team size without usage-based charges.
MessageBird employs usage-based pricing for API calls, messages, and voice minutes, plus monthly fees for platform access and premium features. Costs vary significantly based on communication volume, channels used, and feature requirements.
Cost comparison depends on use case: Hiver provides fixed costs for email collaboration, while MessageBird costs scale with communication volume and technical complexity.
Hiver
Pros
- ✓ Seamless Gmail integration
- ✓ Easy setup for Gmail users
- ✓ Good email management features
Cons
- ✗ Limited to Gmail ecosystem
- ✗ No modern messaging channels
- ✗ Expensive per-user pricing
MessageBird (Bird)
Pros
- ✓ Strong global SMS delivery
- ✓ Comprehensive API documentation
- ✓ Good WhatsApp Business integration
Cons
- ✗ Complex pricing with hidden costs
- ✗ Limited customization options
- ✗ Steep learning curve
Verdict
Choose Hiver if you need immediate email collaboration capabilities within Gmail without technical setup. Choose MessageBird if you're building custom communication solutions and need enterprise-grade APIs for SMS, voice, email, and chat.
Choose Hiver if: Your team manages customer support through Gmail, needs immediate collaboration features, and wants plug-and-play functionality without technical implementation.
Choose MessageBird if: You're building custom communication solutions, need enterprise-grade APIs across multiple channels, and have development resources for implementation.
For teams seeking comprehensive communication tools without API complexity or usage-based pricing, Converge at $49/month offers ready-to-use omnichannel capabilities with straightforward flat-rate pricing.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all Hiver comparisons and all MessageBird (Bird) comparisons.