- Compare
- Front vs Olark
Front vs Olark
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | Front | Olark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $79/seat/mo | From $29/seat/mo |
| Best For | Medium to large technology companies ($10M+ revenue) with complex customer service operations requiring advanced collaboration and automation | Small to medium businesses needing basic live chat |
| Standout Feature | AI-powered collaboration platform that transforms shared inboxes into intelligent team workspaces with real-time suggested responses and automated workflows | Visitor insights and chat targeting |
| Free Plan | ✗ | ✗ |
| G2 Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.2 |
Front and Olark serve different aspects of customer communication. Front provides collaborative team inboxes for comprehensive customer support, while Olark specializes in live chat with a focus on sales conversion and real-time customer engagement.
Front's higher G2 rating of 4.7/5 compared to Olark's 4.2/5 reflects their different specializations - Front excels in team collaboration while Olark focuses specifically on chat effectiveness and ease of use.
Feature Comparison
Front transforms customer support into a collaborative team activity with shared inboxes, internal team discussions, message assignments, and workflow automation. It handles email, social media, and chat through a unified interface designed for team coordination.
Olark specializes exclusively in live chat with features like automated chat routing, visitor insights, chat transcripts, and integration with CRM systems. It excels at converting website visitors into customers through targeted chat triggers and proactive engagement.
Front offers broader channel support and team collaboration, while Olark provides deeper chat-specific functionality including advanced visitor tracking, chat ratings, and detailed conversation analytics.
Pricing Comparison
Front's pricing ranges from $25-$105 per seat monthly, reflecting its comprehensive team collaboration features. The cost includes access to all communication channels but can become expensive as teams grow.
Olark offers more focused pricing at $29-$39 per seat monthly, making it significantly more affordable for teams primarily using live chat. This specialized pricing reflects Olark's narrower but deeper feature set.
For a 10-agent team, Front would cost $250-$1,050 monthly while Olark would cost $290-$390 monthly, making Olark more predictable and budget-friendly for chat-focused support.
Front
Pros
- ✓ Excellent team collaboration features with @mentions and internal comments
- ✓ Modern, intuitive interface familiar to email users
- ✓ Strong AI capabilities including real-time response suggestions
Cons
- ✗ Premium pricing that can be expensive for smaller teams
- ✗ Essential features locked behind higher-tier plans
- ✗ Single channel limitation on Starter plan
Olark
Pros
- ✓ Easy setup and customization
- ✓ Good visitor tracking
- ✓ Reliable uptime
Cons
- ✗ Per-agent pricing gets expensive
- ✗ Limited mobile app functionality
- ✗ No social media integration
Verdict
Choose Front if you need comprehensive team collaboration across multiple support channels. Choose Olark if live chat is your primary customer engagement channel and you want specialized chat features at competitive pricing.
Choose Front if: You need comprehensive team collaboration across multiple support channels and can justify the premium pricing for broader functionality.
Choose Olark if: Live chat is your primary customer engagement channel and you want specialized chat features without paying for unused multichannel capabilities.
Consider Converge at $49/month flat rate - providing team collaboration across channels without per-agent pricing or the complexity of choosing between specialized and comprehensive solutions.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all Front comparisons and all Olark comparisons.