- Compare
- Dixa vs Sendbird
Dixa vs Sendbird
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | Dixa | Sendbird |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $109/seat/mo | From $399/mo |
| Best For | Contact centers needing voice and digital channels | Developers building custom in-app messaging experiences |
| Standout Feature | Unified agent experience across voice and digital | Comprehensive SDK with voice, video, and messaging |
| Free Plan | ✗ | ✓ |
| G2 Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.3 |
Dixa and Sendbird serve different segments of the customer communication market. Dixa focuses on unified customer service with traditional support channels, while Sendbird specializes in in-app messaging and communication APIs for developers.
Both platforms have strong G2 ratings—Dixa at 4.2/5 and Sendbird at 4.3/5—but their approaches to customer communication couldn't be more different.
Feature Comparison
Dixa excels in traditional customer service scenarios with features like intelligent routing, conversation history across channels, and agent productivity tools. Their platform unifies email, chat, phone, and social media into a single agent interface.
Sendbird focuses on real-time messaging infrastructure, providing SDKs for chat, voice, and video calling. Their strength lies in enabling developers to build custom communication experiences with features like message threading, file sharing, and moderation tools.
The fundamental difference: Dixa is an agent-centric platform for customer service teams, while Sendbird is a developer-centric platform for building messaging into applications.
Pricing Comparison
Dixa uses per-agent pricing from $39 to $139 per agent per month, depending on the feature tier. This traditional SaaS model works well for established support teams with predictable headcount.
Sendbird offers usage-based pricing starting free for up to 1,000 monthly active users, scaling to $999/month for enterprise features. This model aligns costs with actual user engagement rather than team size.
For customer service teams, Dixa's per-agent model provides clear cost structure. For product teams building messaging features, Sendbird's usage-based approach offers better cost control during development and scaling phases.
Dixa
Pros
- ✓ True omnichannel
- ✓ Good voice support
- ✓ Modern interface
Cons
- ✗ Per-agent pricing
- ✗ Expensive at scale
- ✗ 5+ seat minimum
Sendbird
Pros
- ✓ Comprehensive SDK suite
- ✓ Excellent developer documentation
- ✓ Scalable infrastructure
Cons
- ✗ Expensive for small businesses
- ✗ Complex pricing structure
- ✗ Limited social media integrations
Verdict
Choose Dixa if you need a comprehensive customer service platform with agent-focused tools. Choose Sendbird if you're building custom messaging experiences within your application.
Choose Dixa if: You're running a customer service operation, need agent productivity tools, or want unified inbox functionality across traditional support channels.
Choose Sendbird if: You're developing custom messaging features, need real-time communication APIs, or want to embed chat functionality in your application.
Alternative: Consider Converge at $49/month flat rate for teams wanting customer communication capabilities without the complexity of per-agent pricing or usage-based billing.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all Dixa comparisons and all Sendbird comparisons.