CM.com vs Userlike
Converge Team
Side-by-side comparison for 2026
| Feature | CM.com | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $83/seat/mo | From $90/mo |
| Best For | Large enterprises and developers needing comprehensive CPaaS solutions with extensive API capabilities | European companies requiring GDPR compliance |
| Standout Feature | Comprehensive Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS) with enterprise-grade infrastructure and extensive API capabilities | Built-in video calling functionality |
| Free Plan | ✗ | ✓ |
| G2 Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.3 |
CM.com and Userlike represent two different philosophies in customer communication. CM.com offers a comprehensive platform with flexible pricing from free to custom enterprise plans, while Userlike focuses on European-style live chat with pricing from €90 to €360 per month.
With CM.com earning a 4.7/5 G2 rating compared to Userlike's 4.3/5, both platforms have proven track records, but serve different market segments and use cases.
Feature Comparison
CM.com excels as a comprehensive communication platform, offering SMS, WhatsApp Business API, voice calls, and live chat in one solution. Their strength lies in omnichannel orchestration and developer-friendly APIs.
Userlike specializes in website live chat with exceptional customization options, including chat design, operator profiles, and conversation routing. They offer strong GDPR compliance and European data hosting.
The key difference: CM.com is built for businesses needing multiple communication channels, while Userlike perfects the live chat experience with superior visitor engagement tools.
Pricing Comparison
CM.com's pricing flexibility is significant - starting free for basic chat and scaling to custom enterprise pricing. This makes it accessible for startups while supporting large organizations.
Userlike's €90-€360 monthly pricing reflects their premium positioning in the European market. While more expensive upfront, their pricing includes advanced features like chat transcripts, file sharing, and detailed analytics without per-agent fees for smaller teams.
CM.com
Pros
- ✓ Extensive channel coverage including voice and SMS
- ✓ Robust API-first architecture for developers
- ✓ Enterprise-grade infrastructure with high uptime
Cons
- ✗ Complex pricing structure with multiple add-on costs
- ✗ Steep learning curve for smaller teams
- ✗ Limited transparency in pricing details
Userlike
Pros
- ✓ Strong European presence
- ✓ GDPR compliant
- ✓ Good WhatsApp integration
Cons
- ✗ Expensive operator-based pricing
- ✗ Limited customization
- ✗ Fewer integrations than competitors
Verdict
Choose CM.com if you need multi-channel communication with SMS, WhatsApp, and voice capabilities at scale. Choose Userlike if you prioritize European data privacy standards and need a focused live chat solution with strong customization options.
Choose CM.com if: You need SMS, WhatsApp, or voice alongside chat, want flexible pricing starting from free, or require global scalability with developer tools.
Choose Userlike if: You're focused on website chat excellence, need GDPR-compliant European hosting, or want premium chat customization without per-agent pricing complexity.
Consider Converge at $49/month flat rate as an alternative that combines multi-channel support with predictable pricing, especially if you want modern chat features without the complexity of enterprise platforms.
Looking for more options? Browse all 750+ platform comparisons, or see all CM.com comparisons and all Userlike comparisons.